中国医科大学学报

中国医科大学学报

中国医科大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 487–490.doi: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2016.06.002

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年反思功能问卷中文版在大学生群体中的信效度研究

莫小恩,刘果,韩继阳,左方舟,夏静,王旭梅   

  1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院心理科,沈阳 110004
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-17 出版日期:2016-06-28 发布日期:2016-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 王旭梅 E-mail:wangxm@sj-hospital.org
  • 作者简介:莫小恩(1990 -),女,硕士研究生.
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(10BSH040);辽宁省科学技术计划(2010225031)

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youth in College Students

MO Xiaoen,LIU Guo,HAN Jiyang,ZUO Fangzhou,XIA Jing,WANG Xumei   

  1. Department of Psychiatry,Shengjing Hospital,China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China
  • Received:2016-03-17 Online:2016-06-28 Published:2016-05-30

摘要: 目的 检验青少年反思功能问卷(RFQY)中文版在大学生人群中的信效度。方法 选取沈阳市高校本科生 903 例和广州市高校本科生 742 例作为大学生样本。选取于中国医科大学附属盛京医院心理门诊就诊的具有边缘型人格特质的患者 70例作为临床样本。对所有样本均采用 RFQY 中文版、基本共情量表(BES)和情绪智力量表(EIS)进行调查。2 周后,从大学生样本中随机选择 73 例进行重测。使用 SPSS 17.0 软件进行统计分析。结果 RFQY 中文版总样本、沈阳大学生样本及广州大学生样本的内部一致性信度分别为 0.747、0.741 和 0.757,重测信度为 0.691(P < 0.001)。RFQY 得分男女生之间、大学生样本和临床样本之间存在统计学差异(分别为 9.00±0.55 vs 9.13±0.53,P < 0.001;9.06±0.55 vs 8.65±0.69,P < 0.001)。结论 RFQY 中文版在大学生人群中具有良好的信度和效度,是一种可靠并有效的测量心智化水平的工具。

关键词: 心智化, 反思功能, 中文版, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of reflective function questionnaire for youth(RFQY)in Chinese college students. Methods Totally 903 college students in two universities in Shenyang and 742 college students in one university in Guangzhou were enrolled in the study. Besides,70 patients with borderline personality trait who visited Department of Psychiatry in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were selected as clinical population. All of the subjects were required to fill in the Chinese Version of the RFQY,BES and EIS. Two weeks later,73 college students were randomly selected and filled in the questionnaires again. All data were analyzed with SPSS l7.0 software. Results The internal consistencies of the Chinese Version of RFQY were 0.747 for total subjects,0.741 for Shenyang college students,and 0.757 for Guangzhou college students,respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0.691(P < 0.001). The RFQY scores of male students were significantly lower than those of female(9.00±0.55 vs 9.13±0.53,P < 0.001). The RFQY scores of college students were significantly higher than those of clinical population(9.06±0.55 vs 8.65±0.69,P < 0.001). Conclusion The Chinese version of RFQY shows a good reliability and validity in college students,and is reliable and valid as an instrument to measure mentalization.

Key words: mentalization, reflective functioning, Chinese version, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R749
[1] 帖黎明, 刘果, 王旭梅. 中文版儿童父母养育方式量表的修订与信效度评价[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2018, 47(10): 886-890.
[2] 王晶瑶,韩继阳,杨姝同,刘果,王旭梅. 元认知评估量表 2009 修订版中文版的修订与信效度研究[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2017, 46(7): 609-612.
[3] 王思亓 ,宋岩松 ,席淑华 ,马亚楠. 公共卫生执业医师工作满意度量表信度效度分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2017, 46(6): 536-539.
[4] 徐莉丝,刘果,韩继阳,莫小恩,刘鹏洋,王旭梅. 反思功能问卷-54中文版的修订及信效度研究[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2017, 46(10): 878-881.
[5] 左方舟,刘果,韩继阳,莫小恩,王旭梅. 青少年反思功能问卷中文版的信效度研究[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2016, 45(7): 601-603.
[6] 苏荣坤,豆立宁,王旭梅,刘果,刘浩,CLONINGER Claude Robert. 学龄前儿童气质性格量表的信效度研究[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2016, 45(12): 1072-1076.
[7] 蔡启霞,刘浩,Claude Robert CLONINGER,王旭梅. 气质性格量表(TCI?R140)中文版在一般人群中信效度检验及在不同性别、年龄组上得分差异的比较[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2014, 43(10): 879-884.
[8] 李黎黎, 王哲. 发育和健康状况评定量表在儿童青少年抑郁障碍中的应用[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2009, 38(11): 865-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!

中国医科大学学报版权所有©2018

未经允许,严禁擅自转载本站图文资料

地址:中国 沈阳市沈北新区蒲河路77号 110122

辽ICP备05014850

JOURNAL OF CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

ADDRESS: NO.77 PUHE ROAD

SHENYANG NORTH NEW AREA, SHENYANG

LIAONING PROVINCE, P.R. CHINA